Database Moderator
  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


File Comments posted by MigJmz

  1. 38 minutes ago, kitsunebi said:

    Actually, that's something the editor themselves is supposed to do before releasing them here.  Our releases should not have any visible damage from creases, tears, or any other flaws caused by debinding.  It's one of the things that sets our Photoshopped releases apart from the Internet Archive's plethora of raw unedited scans.

    EDIT: I just took a look at this file, and it has not been properly edited to meet Retromags standards in its current state.  It would not have been approved if submitted by a first-time uploader until further revisions were made.  Too many pages show evidence of debinding and need to be cleaned up in Photoshop or another photo-editing software. As Migjmz points out, those adjustments are relatively easy (content aware fill tool!!) but they should have been made before this was uploaded here.

    His other egm scans have these tears visible too, I wish he ran them by me first. He obviously doesn't know how to fix these simple mistakes so he might need a editor before releasing them (me). 

    What exactly is his title? Content contributor? Why does he have upload powers.

  2. Im particularly proud of the ad edits myself that I eliminated the side markings completely.

     Yes theres some waves here and there but I think there not too noticeable. I straightened them out by moving each letter! You can imagine how long that took. Also there were alot of block lines on pages that look too wavy so those got fix.

    Thx for fixing the db issue I didn't notice it was broken.